Viable Proposal for Disarming the Middle East of Weapons of Mass
Destruction
By: Dr. Yehuda Atai
Aug 2008
The situation cannot remain as is. One day the Middle East is bound to
be demilitarized and all weapons of mass destruction will be eliminated.
This will happen either in a terrible war which will be disastrous for
the region's inhabitants, or due to international pressure applied by
severe sanctions, or in an initiated move based on premeditation which
will not only remove the threat, but will instigate a much desired
change of tides, bringing peace and harmony to the Middle East.
There are already several areas on earth that have been decreed WMD free
(see linked map). Practical and legal experience in disarming and
demilitarizing has been acquired over the past three decades. The
knowledge necessary for dismantling nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons exists as well as effective supervision measures. The SALT I
accord has compelled Russia and the United States to reduce their
nuclear weapon inventory by more than 50% and to disassemble most of
their chemical weaponry in a controlled and systematic manner. Led by
Hans Blix, UNESCOM has successfully overseen the disarming of the
chemical warfare means Iraq had possessed, and made sure it was devoid
of any nuclear capacities and that the country is WMD free.
Middle East Demilitarization Initiative – Premises:
1. There is no unilateral deterrence. Arab countries have not been
misled by Israel's "vagueness". They have amassed chemical weapons, or
"nuclear bombs for the poor" so to speak, that cover the entire land of
Israel, whereas Israel cannot guarantee that these chemical bombs, which
can kill thousands in a single bombing, will not be dropped. The
deterrence is therefore mutual. The only alternative which stands to
increase the security of Israeli citizens and citizens of neighboring
countries is the eradication of weapons of mass destruction from the
area. This is a common interest for the entire population of the region.
2. A process. In order to attain safe and secure disarming, the
countries involved must participate in a gradual, long process.
Therefore this viable proposal speaks of two phases. The first phase
will be forming an international coalition of countries, approved of and
supervised by the UN, under whose authority the disarming agreements of
the region's various countries will be signed. In the second phase, the
disassembling and disarming will be carried out, in practice, under
appropriate supervision.
3. Definition of Middle East Zone: It is imperative to determine which
countries are to be considered Middle Eastern, in order to decide which
countries should join the aforementioned international coalition. As
long as various organizations and countries differ in their definition
for Middle East, there can be no agreement as to the counties that are
to be bound by the demilitarization accord. Hence, a definition stating
which countries are to be included should at least be suggested. On the
other hand, any other country that deems itself eligible for entering
this treaty ought to be accepted.
Suggested List of Middle East Countries to be Included in the Agreement:
Egypt - A country that borders Israel and holds WMD. Egypt has signed
the African WMD disarming covenant – the Pelindaba Treaty.
Saudi Arabia – Does not have any WMD, but has long range missiles that
cover the entire area of Israel. Saudi Arabia has signed the
international pacts for non-distribution of nuclear weapon.
Israel – Is armed with WMD. There is no international or any civil
internal mechanism that oversees Israel's weapons of mass destruction
arsenal.
Yemen, Oman, Abu Dhabi, Qatar and Kuwait - Are all countries in the Arab
peninsula who hold no WMD. Due to their involvement in the conflict,
however, they should be included in the WMD free zone.
Lebanon, Syria, and Iran – Are the countries in the region that
constitute part of the mutual deterrence constellation. Syria and Iran
wield chemical weapons, and Lebanon, or rather the Hezbollah acting
therein, can easily reach Israel with chemical-warhead artillery.
Turkey – Is an integral part of the Middle East. It is a local
super-power, NATO member and shares the interest to have the region
demilitarized.
Cyprus – Also a distinctly Middle Eastern counter, EU member, and an
active constituent in the NATO layout. Cyprus has no WMD.
Other countries such as Libya, Algeria and Pakistan were excluded from
the list of Middle Eastern countries that are to participate in the
agreement, due to the complexity of the process. It is preferable to
avoid further complication by adding peripheral countries and broadening
the mutual deterrence balance. The proposed list is optimal in terms of
the security afforded thereby to the region's population and the
practical feasibility of implementing the disarming process.
4. Israeli Prime Minister Call. The Israeli prime minister is authorized
to have Israel join the demilitarization initiative. A prime minister
capable of fathoming the inevitable consequences of the WMD arms race
should be able to push forward a move that will cause the Israeli
authorities to widely support the disarming. In fact, a decision of this
nature is inherently in the hands of the prime minister and is not
subject to parliament approval, just as Prime Minister Begin decided to
bomb the nuclear reactor in Iraq despite objections by the heads of MOSSAD and IDF Intelligence.
Practical, Tactic-Strategic Proposal for Carrying Out the Actual
Disarming
First Phase: Instigation
Since Israel has excess conventional and non-conventional military
might, and since demilitarization is clearly highly desirable from the
Israeli point of view, it must take several actions concurrently.
First phase duration: 16 – 18 months
A. The Israeli prime minister appoints a public official, who is not
part of Israel's defense array, to be in charge of the planning and
execution of the feat. A small team of various government and defense
forces institutions personnel is assembled.
– three months.
B. Israel notifies the US, the EU, Russia and China of the initiative,
the succession of actions Israel wishes to lead and the UN assist it to
bring it about. This should be accomplished within one month, in a joint
campaign embarked on by the prime minister and the minister of defense.
– one month.
C. An Israeli team prepares for contriving the plan for disassembling
the weapons, and workers are assigned to the various facilities where
the work would be done. Since the WMD budget would substantially
decrease owing to the demilitarization, the surplus will be used for
having the employees retrained in other fields of industry. A financial
framework for the plants' disassembly and the retraining of workers is
to be set up. The retraining will commence on the third month of the
process, and will continue for several years. It is vital that the
employees be explained that their retaining is a necessity brought about
by social and technological changes like the ones that had occurred in
the textile industry and in agriculture. These worker's skills can be
redirected towards new industries that are now developed, some of which
are in fact located in the Soreq and Negev nuclear research centers and
elsewhere. This is feasible and must be implemented over a relatively
long time.
D. Two or three month after the process is started, once the prime
minister and his staff finish their excursions abroad, the first
publicly announced action will be taken. Israel declares its intention
to start a process of stripping the Middle East from all weapons of mass
destruction, nuclear, chemical, biological or other.
In that announcement, Israel will also call for a meeting with regional
country leaders, as listed above, and to convene as Demilitarization
Congress. It also announces cessation of activity in the Dimona reactor
and allows the IAEA to perform an audit to confirm its shutdown.
[At this stage Israel will be able to shut the reactor down without
jeopardizing its security, since it has enough bombs whose average
lifespan is greater than 100 years - uranium bombs like the one dropped
on Hiroshima – and some shorter lived enriched lithium plutonium bombs.
Merely closing the center will take more than a year. Israel would be
more secure, having the world backing its initiative].
E. Action teams from the listed countries hold meetings and set a date
for the congregation of the Demilitarization Congress where the
disassembly and disarming agreements will be signed. The teams will be
assisted by experts from those international organizations that have
handled such matters before. The teams will draw various agreements and
practical joint frameworks. One of the institutions to be formed by the
Demilitarization Congress, for example, will be a committee for actual
disassembly and disarming headed by a competent international public
figure.
- Six Months
At the Demilitarization Congress, the big powers, NATO and UN
institutions will sign agreements guaranteeing security for all the
region's countries throughout the implementation of the disarming
process, including fixed current financing for the execution of the
disassembling weapons and disarming.
At the Demilitarization Congress, countries will sign a new
international treaty that aggregates and binds together all the
non-distribution international accords, such as the NPT, CWC, BTWC, CTBT,
forming a single unified pact. There will be no distinction between
nuclear, chemical, biological or any other kind of WMD. The
Demilitarization Congress will, in effect, bestow, to all nations of the
world, a uniform agreement that applies to all WMD – A Disarming
Agreement.
The Demilitarization Congress will also set a date for commencing the
disarming in practice, as by its various phases as contrived by the
various committees, no later than 6 months thereafter. The actual
disarming and disassembly committee will begin helping all the region's
countries to prepare for the actual disarming.
Second Phase: Actual Disarming
Second phase duration: 26 – 30 months.
A. At this time, six months after the Demilitarization Congress, the
participating countries will submit all information they have regarding WMD layouts, including all inventory, material, equipment and storage
specifications of the weapons they possess to a sub-committee of the
actual disassembly and disarming committee. This disclosure of
information is meant to enable to evaluate and devise courses of action
for reciprocal disassembly and disarming by all participating countries.
- About three months.
B. The actual disarming committee, made up of representatives from all
listed Middle Eastern countries, helped by the guaranteeing countries
and organizations, procures the means necessary for locating and
designating all sites of material or facilities to be used for
disassembly and disposal. The actual disarming committee will be
responsible for controlling and maintaining these sites.
- About three months.
C. Special work groups delegated by the disarming committee begin a
controlled process of disassembly and disposal. Transferring the sites
to the disarming committee control should take about three months.
Simultaneously, active supervision units are deployed and employed by
the disarming committee in all the countries involved.
D. The disassembling workers execute the disarming and disassembly in
the aforementioned sites until all weapons and warfare materials therein
are dismantled. This should take between 12 and 18 months. Some of these
sites will remain closed for decades thereafter, or even more.
It is important to mention that as soon as the disarming is instigated,
the terrible danger will be lifted from over our heads, and the mere
initiative would inspire hope for a comprehensive and fundamentally
sustainable peace in the region. This will encourage all its
inhabitants, especially Israelis and Palestinians, to strive for an all
inclusive appropriate resolution of the conflict. Since day one, this
move will brighten global forecasts, and the wheels of trade and economy
systems would be jolted into motion with renewed vigor. The Israeli
economy, for one, will benefit from saving 1.5 billion USD in its
current budget, that is 14 to 15 percent of its national security budget.
Meanwhile, a highly professional workforce will join its new industries.
Social-economic momentum stems from a society's optimistic view of its
near and far future. Demilitarizing the Middle East will remove a grave
threat and induce true hope, new thriving, and the possibility to open
the entire Middle East for free trade.
The current reality is just one possibility, it is not inevitable.
Disarming the region is possible and we must demand of our leaders to be
bold and wise and begin this process now.
|